Crimson Desert’s lower review scores were because critics didn’t get… | HappeningNow.news

Gaming · 5 views

Crimson Desert’s lower review scores were because critics didn’t get a ‘fair chance to explore’, exec says

Crimson Desert’s review scores were lower than expected because the press weren’t given the optimal experience, a Pearl Abyss executive says.

Source Summary Published 58m ago Brief Under 1 min brief
Story intelligence
Coverage Single outlet Single-outlet story
Views 5 Community interest
Brief read Under 1 min brief 64 words

Summary

Crimson Desert’s review scores were lower than expected because the press weren’t given the optimal experience, a Pearl Abyss executive says. In an interview with The Game Business , the studio’s European CEO Lybee Park was asked why she felt the player response to game was extremely positive but the Metacritic score was 77 (which is not necessarily bad, but perhaps lower than expected).

Read original at Video Games Chronicle

More from Gaming

Continue reading recent Gaming coverage

Support HappeningNow

Independent AI-powered news analysis is reader-supported. Your contribution helps cover infrastructure, summaries, and continued platform development.

Support HappeningNow

Report an issue with this page