Gaming · 5 views
Crimson Desert’s lower review scores were because critics didn’t get a ‘fair chance to explore’, exec says
Crimson Desert’s review scores were lower than expected because the press weren’t given the optimal experience, a Pearl Abyss executive says.
Summary
Crimson Desert’s review scores were lower than expected because the press weren’t given the optimal experience, a Pearl Abyss executive says. In an interview with The Game Business , the studio’s European CEO Lybee Park was asked why she felt the player response to game was extremely positive but the Metacritic score was 77 (which is not necessarily bad, but perhaps lower than expected).
AI summaries can be wrong sometimes—always verify important details using the source article.
How AI & Automation are usedMore from Gaming
Continue reading recent Gaming coverage
- This Wonderful Animal Crossing-Like Is Now Free For Switch Online MembersContinue reading
- New Razer Basilisk V4 executes perfect 180 degree turns at the click of a button, all while looking like a Power Ranger's footContinue reading
- How to complete To the Skies in Arc RaidersContinue reading
- Final Fantasy VII Revelation Cast Get Emotional In Last Recording SessionsContinue reading
Support HappeningNow
Independent AI-powered news analysis is reader-supported. Your contribution helps cover infrastructure, summaries, and continued platform development.
Support HappeningNow