AI Summary

The Ninth Circuit ruled that a California federal court had improperly granted summary judgment in favor of the Invisalign company and its iTero scanner. The court found that the company had allegedly tried to monopolize the aligner and scanner markets by ending its interoperability agreement with the competing TRIOS scanner. Plaintiffs had presented a prima facie case that the termination was not justified by a pro‑competitive, non‑pretextual business reason. The decision allows the antitrust suit to proceed.

AI summaries can be wrong sometimes—always verify important details using the source article.